Aboriginal Art is primarily a form of religious expression

Occasionally I will post a thread on Indigenous Australia, which admittedly doesn’t attract lively debate, but that’s not its purpose.  Let’s just say it’s a forum in which I am able to impart much of my knowledge on the least understood culture in our own country.

Today I want to talk about art.

An Aboriginal elder once said: ‘Our painting carries the spirituality of who we are’.  This beautiful description inspires the novice such as myself to seek an understanding of Aboriginal art, and guided with the signpost ‘spirituality.’

This is what I learnt.

Every aspect of Aboriginal culture was born in the Dreaming, and this is reflected in the art, itself an expression of the Dreaming.  But further, the art is an extension of how the Aboriginal people relate to their position in the world.  As change swept across their culture with the arrival of Europeans, so too did the art, yet it still retained the thread of spirituality.  This thread can even be found in the reproductions of the contemporary artists who have benefited by the popularity of Aboriginal art.

Art could be rock art, ground art, body paintings, bark paintings, weapon decorating, and the sculptures of Northern Australia.  Works of art, whether they be painted on canvas or crafted in bronze, signed by a master or be of lazy scribbles, are all of one purpose: They capture a moment or a meaning and freeze it in time.  Aboriginal art is different.  Aboriginal art is holistic, as is ‘time’ to the Aboriginal people.

To fully appreciate and interpret Aboriginal art one must have an understanding of the hand that creates it.  This hand would belong to a person who lives by the law of the Dreaming; who knows that the Dreaming is as it was lived and that how it is still lived; and who knows that the Dreaming is an erasable map of the past, the present, and the future.  The Dreaming is in the art, and art is an expression of ceremonial and religious life.

My old university lecturer said that the various art forms of Aboriginal society were attributed to the Dreaming.  Ancestral Beings had painted the original design and the artist who painted on bark or drew in the sand was copying the designs inherited from the ancestors.

It is not hard to imagine that the Ancestral Beings watch over the artist at work, ensuring that the events of the Dreaming are perpetuated in today’s culture.  That perhaps art itself is a religious activity.  Or perhaps, too, that art is a visual language.  In essence, that the permanence of Aboriginal life is ensured by the invoking of powerful forces through the symbolism of art.  It reflects a concern with the questions of origin and purpose, as interpreted in the Dreaming.

I have introduced Aboriginal art as a religious and traditional expression.  Since 1788 the Aboriginal people have been embattled with changes in their customs and cultures.  Does the work of the contemporary artist reflect these changes?  Has the religious significance been diminished?  And what too of the commercial interest that Aboriginal art now attracts, does this affect the cultural integrity of the work?’  Read on, dear bloggers, as these formative questions will be considered.

Some recent works of traditional art, (recent being post 1788) clearly do not depict what could be perceived as being of any religious significance.  These works for example, include depictions of European invaders.  My old lecturer, however, explained that sorcery has long been an element in Aboriginal culture, and this may have been the underlying inspiration in the artists’ attempts to deal with the intruders.

In this context it could be taken that art, as a traditional medium in the perpetuation of culture, had perceived and recognised the intruders as the carriers of change in the cultural landscape.

Aboriginal art has recently gained a worldwide audience, which has brought financial rewards to many artists.  (There are an estimated 6,000 artists who produce works for the local or overseas markets).  The traditional values of these contemporary works are questioned as is their religious portrayal.  As art was traditionally a function of ritual life, many non-Aboriginals view that the economic motive may have isolated it from this context.  What is ignored, however, is that the hands that create this art are driven by the same forces that inspired the artists of 40,000 years ago.  The reasons for making art do change, yet they have not lost their Aboriginal identity.

Aboriginal art takes on many forms and numerous mediums can be used.  Two of the most recognisable are the rock art found in Northern Australia, and the abstract imagery found in Central Australia and other desert regions.

Rock art is predominantly found on the walls of shallow caves or on the faces of rocky outcrops in either paintings or engravings.  The latter style was produced deep into the mythical past, believed in tribal lore to have been created by a race of long ago.  Some of these engravings have been dated to 35,000 years.  Engravings usually constitute figurative representations of men, women, animals and mythical beings.

Rock paintings – again primarily of humans and animals – were coloured from materials such as clays, ochres, plants and charcoal applied with brushes made of twigs or hair.  Many of these paintings, whilst originally created thousands of years ago have been preserved for their cultural value: If these figures are renovated by their tribal leaders at the beginning of the wet season, it is believed these paintings have the power to bring rain and cause the animals to increase.

Two of the more distinctive forms of rock paintings are the x-ray style of paintings and the stencilled images of human hands.  The other form of art given I have mentioned – that of Central Australia – is not as naturalistic as the rock art, consisting of concentric circles, dotting, tracks and meandering lines.  These abstract forms however, are symbols that represent an aspect of daily life.  A circle for example, would represent a waterhole.

The art of Central Australia is popular among contemporary artists who reproduce the designs or stories on canvas.  This is a world away from the resources employed by the traditional artists.  The dry, sandy deserts allowed no better medium than the ground itself, and sometimes the paintings would cover several hectares and take months to produce.  Often these paintings would be prepared for ceremonial ritual or for storytelling, and as with the abstract markings, the colours too were symbolic.  Red ochre, symbolic of blood and therefore the life-force of man, was highly prized.  People travelled great distances to obtain the correct colour for their artistic needs.

I have commented on the religious expression contained in Aboriginal art in both its traditional and contemporary form.  This expression is an echo from the Dreaming, which is evident on a rock painting dating back thousands of years to a reproduction on canvass of modern times.

Amid the changes that Aboriginal culture has contended with, the art has incorporated these changes while still retaining its spiritual message.  Aboriginal art is as much alive today as it was 40,000 years ago.  As in that ancient past, the art – significantly – is not easily separable from everyday life.

Aboriginal hollow log tombs. National Gallery,...

Aboriginal hollow log tombs. National Gallery, Canberra, Australia (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

23 comments on “Aboriginal Art is primarily a form of religious expression

  1. Thnx for the informative post Migs.

    “Aboriginal art is as much alive today as it was 40,000 years ago.”

    It still amazes me to think that people lived in this country for 40,000 years or more and native animals are still here. And rivers.

    I can’t imagine what will happen if we don’t change our ways soon…I can’t see the rivers, other species and such survivin’. What a mess in just over 200 years. Sigh.

    I wonder if the Aboriginal people are recordin’ the extensive damage made by way of their art? Just in case we all die out. Or for spiritual reasons.

    N’

  2. For many years it was thought that Aboriginal occupation of Australia extends back 40,000 years. The oldest dates under the C14 (carbon dating technique) had a ceiling of 40,000 years, hence the assumption that that was when the occupation started.

    In the last decade it has been discovered that C14 dating cannot date anything past 40,000 years. If an archaeological record was, say, 50,000 years old, the C14 dating method would give it an age of 40,000 years only.

    Advanced dating methods are now being employed and we now know that the oldest evidence of the Aboriginal occupation of Australia is 63,000 years, from archaeological evidence discovered at a rock shelter in Queensland.

    Given that 17% of Australia is submerged since the melting of the ice from the last Glacial Maximus (Ice Age) 9,500 years ago, it is safe to assume that the oldest records lay at the bottom of the sea.

    It’s anybody’s guess at when the occupation began. Data discovered at Lake George (near Canberra) in the 1970s has some people thinking that Aborigines were there 110,000 year ago.

    Some rock carvings in WA are so old, that the local Indigenous population (who have been there for 35,000 years) believe them to be left from a civilization that pre-dates their arrival.

    Fascinating stuff.

  3. Agreed, absolutely fascinating stuff Migs. After reading your very informative post this morning I Googled aboriginal art and was very surprised about the complexity of the art forms. For example there was one which was the symbol for women sitting. This obviously can be considered a written language, only it’s tens of thousands of years earlier than any other written language.

  4. When I was at uni in 1997 a young Asian student was telling me she found some part-time work at a small cottage in the Adelaide Hills. “Doing what?” I asked. “Copying Aboriginal art work and painting on boomerangs to sell to tourists.”

    Absolutely disgraceful.

  5. Makes ya wonder eh Migs?

    Still. We’re seein’ some positives now.

    A Song of Hope
    by Oodgeroo (Kath Walker)

    Look up, my people,
    The dawn is breaking
    The world is waking
    To a bright new day
    When none defame us
    No restriction tame us
    Nor colour shame us
    Nor sneer dismay.

    Now brood no more
    On the years behind you
    The hope assigned you
    Shall the past replace
    When a juster justice
    Grown wise and stronger
    Points the bone no longer
    At a darker race.

    So long we waited
    Bound and frustrated
    Till hat e be hated
    And caste deposed
    Now light shall guide us
    No goal denied us
    And all doors open
    That long were closed.

    See plain the promise
    Dark freedom-lover!
    Night’s nearly over
    And though long the climb
    New rights will greet us
    New mateship meet us
    And joy complete us
    In our new Dream Time.

    To our fathers’ fathers
    The paid, the sorrow;
    To our children’s children
    the glad tomorrow.

    Read more: http://www.creativespirits.info/aboriginalculture/arts/aboriginal-poems/a-song-of-hope.html#ixzz13WNzI8Rd

    N’

  6. Love it Nas’. My favorite from Oodgeroo is Son of Mine. I first came across this via the LP Gary Shearston’s ‘Australian Broadside’ in about ’65.

    Son Of Mine

    My son, your troubled eyes search mine,
    Puzzled and hurt by colour line.
    Your black skin soft as velvet shine;
    What can i tell you, son of mine?

    I could tell you of heartbreak, hatred blind,
    I could tell you of crimes that shame mankind,
    Of brutal wrong and deeds malign,
    Of rape and murder, son of mine;

    But I’ll tell instead of brave and fine
    When lives of black and white inwine,
    And men in brotherhood combine-
    This would I tell, you son of mine.

  7. Agreed Nas’, great stuff. Oodgeroo recognises the dark past and wrongs but doesn’t dwell..always looking forward.

  8. “but doesn’t dwell..always looking forward.”

    Yes, it’s the best way forward. Good point Min.

    Perhaps Howard could’ve learnt that lesson. I guess he’ll spend the rest of his life justifyin’ his dark & sorry deeds.

    I still remember that emotional moment when Ruddy said “sorry”. Imagine the burden, pain, stress it lifted off some people’s shoulders. It was a start…and good on him.

    And those who went on the reconcilliation walks:

    http://www.abc.net.au/am/stories/s217991.htm

    and:

    http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/11/14/2419492.htm

    N’

  9. Howard exposes his inner little man

    Laurie Oakes From: The Daily Telegraph October 23, 2010

    http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/opinion/howard-exposes-his-inner-little-man/story-e6frezz0-1225942412612

    According to Fairfax papers, Howard also says in Lazarus Rising that Costello is an elitist who lacked the ability to connect with ordinary Australians.

    “You know what that means,” a former Howard government minister said yesterday. “John thought Pauline Hanson had appeal to ordinary Australians, and Peter condemned her.

    “John thought ordinary voters were not interested in reconciliation, while Peter wanted to take part in the reconciliation walk across the Sydney Harbour Bridge.”

    Says heaps really. Not surprised he kept Costello out.

    N’

  10. Pingback: Vegas Nature: Red Rock Canyon « golfkat Travel Blog – Aboriginal Art is primarily a form of religious expression « Café … – Newspaper Rock: Oprah to visit Aboriginal rock art – and more « Caves

  11. Pingback: Aboriginal Art is primarily a form of religious expression « Café … – Rock Shelters of Bhimbetka : Paleolithic and Mesolithic Period – Newspaper Rock: Oprah to visit Aboriginal rock art – and more « Caves

  12. Pingback: Rock Shelters of Bhimbetka : Paleolithic and Mesolithic Period – Aboriginal Art is primarily a form of religious expression « Café … – Newspaper Rock: Oprah to visit Aboriginal rock art – and more « Caves

  13. Nas, I’d be interested if Howard mentions ATSIC in his book (but I won’t be buying it to find out).

    He always wanted to ‘get’ some ATSIC identities and his best way of doing this was to kill ATSIC. Stuff the services they were offering, he wanted to punish his selected victims.

    And perhaps you wouldn’t fail to notice that within three years of destroying ATSIC he had to call the army in (the NT intervention). And there he rode on top of his gallant stallion, little Johnnie Hero: “I’ll fix this mess but just don’t tell anyone that I helped cause it in the first place”.

    Here’s something that might surprise everyone; Howard had been after ATSIC for years but he was always met with the same stumbling block: Phillip Ruddock. Yep, that’s right, Phillip Ruddock. The zombi saw the good that ATSIC was doing and always stood up to the little maniac.

    Unlike Costello, however (who wanted to walk across the bridge), he never made this public.

    We had our own walk across the bridge in Port Augusta. The support was awesome. The local State Liberal MP almost had a seizure, such was the extent of his opposition. Closing the bridge for 15 minutes would surely destroy the country.

    Laughable.

  14. Miglo. I agree. Howard was even more devious than what people give him credit for. For example, it’s often been expressed how Howard ‘responded to’ problems but little has been written about how he created the perceived problem in the first place.

    For example, Headlines in the MSM: disabled pensioners rort the system. Howard responds by ‘coming down hard on’ disabled pensioners. However, the whole thing was a set up in the first place. Howard via press releases advised that he was going to take action against disabled pensioners – the press runs a story – Howard to the rescue.

    It’s the same as sending in the cavalry when it was the same person in charge of the Indians circling the wagon train.

    And yes that surprises me about Ruddock.

  15. I know next to nothing about Aboriginal Art, but I did enjoy watching on TV a week or so back one Aboriginal artist’s walk through a gallery devoted to Aboriginal art, and his ‘singing’ (?) the ‘art’ (?) and ‘place’ (?) and ‘story’ (?) as he came across another artist’s work, and then another’s, which he ‘recognized’ and felt (?) enough to interact with among the collection on display. The only disappointment in that vicarious experience, for me, was that I understood nearly none of the deeper significances of what was happening right in front of me; and wondering what other ‘songs’ there were among the unrecognized.

  16. Hi Metetron. ‘Singing the country’ is an old Aboriginal tradition rarely heard about these days. Apart from it’s reason of respecting the land, I know little else about it.

  17. Min, Ruddock had the ATSIC portfolio. He saw the good that they did. Howard should have listened to him more.

  18. Meta’ from the bit that I know Aboriginal art is not just pictorial but is ‘writing’, telling a story. European art can do this also but is mostly pictorial and is an attempt to capture an accurate representation (portraits), or tries to capture the essence via impressions (Van Gogh). But either whichway it is an interpretation of a moment in time.

    However, with Aboriginal art you can see their story, therefore the underlying meaning of the art is fluid compared with the ‘snapshot in time’ of European art.

    By fluid, this is what was and still is. There is a meeting place of women, it was near a stream, and it was a good place to fish. And 40,000 years later it is still meeting place of women and still a good place to fish.

    In European art one might have a factual representation of women fishing as a snapshot in time, but this does not convey the same meaning…this is what was and this is what it is now.

  19. Hi all, Ruddock was a member of Amnesty way back when, and I remember his daughter went overseas because of his actions as Immigration Minister. He rushed off to the Right with the rest of them, perhaps to curry favour with their dear leader. Traded his honour for power.
    Min, it’s a bit like the Pat Boone conversation…I didn’t know he was still alive !!
    Miglo, thank you for this article. Like Joni, I’ll have to read it again.

  20. Hi Min, you’ve hit the nail right on the head. You’ve obviously grasped the fluidity (is that a word?) of Aboriginal art, in that it represents more than just a point in time value.

    Go to the top of the class. 🙂

  21. Pingback: Tweets that mention Aboriginal Art is primarily a form of religious expression « Café Whispers -- Topsy.com

Leave a Comment