“Treasurer Joe Hockey has signaled a further increase in the pension age, more welfare means testing and co-payments for medical services in a speech in Washington delivered as the budget takes shape”.
And it’s not if we didn’t see that one coming. For quite a while now Hockey has been “priming his audience” with stern lessons about how we must “end the Age of Entitlement”. Hopefully it’s not just those least able to defend themselves who will be at the top of the Liberal government’s agenda. To date the cuts already announced, and often surreptitiously, do not instill me with a great deal of confidence; cuts to welfare groups including the PCYC, cuts to legal aid for Aboriginal people and has begun dismantling the GP super clinics, to name but a few.
But surely when Hockey spoke about the ‘Age of Entitlement’ he was referring to the upper income brackets, those with plenty of cash to splash on luxuries such as multiple investment properties and private this and that. . . but perhaps not.
But let’s admit it, we have been forewarned. . .
From April 2012,
Despite an aging population and a higher standard of living than that enjoyed by our children, western democracies in particular have been reluctant to wind back universal access to payments and entitlements from the state.
Quite right and bravo, Joe! Obviously Hockey was on the cusp of announcing that he didn’t support his boss
Credlin, Abbott’s fervent desire to pay ‘women of calibre’ $75,000 for bonding time with bubs. Or perhaps he was referring to the cancellation of all upper class welfare and other lurks and perks.
But of course not. These are the same people who add, and substantially to Liberal Party coffers. . . they are therefore a no-go zone.
The Daily Telegraph was clearly stunned to learn:
Senior government sources have confirmed that Australians over the age of 70 are also almost universally securing free or discount medicine because they qualify for taxpayer-funded concession card schemes.
A stunning 94 per cent of Australians over 70 qualify for either a pensioner concession card or a seniors health care card for self-funded retirees.
The growing number of older Australians claiming discount medicine under the PBS is a challenge for the government because 78 per cent of the cost of scripts claimed at chemists under the PBS is going to concession cardholders.
Hell, we can’t have that! The luxury, the profligacy – *gasp* discount medicine! Perhaps we should go back to “the good old days” and have pensioners cut their heart tablets in half to make their prescriptions last that little bit longer. Pensioners also receive free hearing aids, plus “low cost” batteries, discounts on public transport, plus on electricity. OMG the world’s gone mad! It’s all the pensioners’ fault. We have to stop it now – we simply cannot afford these oldies and their draining the dollars from “hard working Australians”. How much was that again that Brandis was going to cost us for his new library? How much was that again that Abbott cost the taxpayer because he didn’t fancy staying the $3,000pw temporary Canberra residence, the house that he had originally chosen?
However, and in the real world, it is important that politicians at least make a semblance of keeping their promises, and it is understandable that at times some do get broken or bent in the process of having to re-jig a government in that particular political party’s own image. Gillard certainly paid the price for her poorly explained price on carbon, the JuLiar tag being the result. So I wonder what the public will make of this plethora of broken promises coming from the Liberals?
In a pledge, an absolute guarantee Tony Abbott said on the night before the 2013 election:
“No cuts to education, no cuts to health, no change to pensions, no change to the GST and no cuts to the ABC or SBS.”
And election eve pledges are certainly ones which need to be believed as these are the promises on which many people base their voting decision. To sneak into victory based on a series of known falsehoods is deception at it’s worst.